Hey, long time no see. Blame the damn assignments for uni. Anyway, I want to talk in this blog post about a problem. Something that is a major problem in so many
really good franchises, that don't just annoy me, it annoys a lot of people. I’m talking about
pointless character death.
Don't get me
wrong, I’m totally fine with character death... sort of. But only when it is a
necessary death that serves a purpose. When it doesn’t serve a purpose and it
was simply done for either shock value or to create tension between characters,
it really winds me up.
Take Sam on
How To Get Away With Murder, his death was necessary because the entire show is
built around Keating and her students getting away with his murder. His death
was semi-justified too, he was an absolutely horrible human being, for reasons
I won’t get into for people who plan on watching the show, and his death is the
premise of the first season.
Another
example is Rue from The Hunger Games. Its a horrendously painful character
death, but it serves a purpose of sparking off the revolution and forces
Katniss to fight back and get revenge on that Capital.
But when a
character death is utterly pointless, I just get so annoyed. Recently, I was
watching season 10 of Supernatural, and it got to - spoiler alert here guys if
you’re not on season 10 - where Charlie Bradbury died. And her death was so
completely and utterly pointless and wrong that I was angry about it for days afterwards. Basically, she died to
drive a wedge between Sam and Dean, that was it. She died for that single
reason, there was no other reason whatsoever. And it was incredibly annoying.
I mean, the
writers could have not killed her,
and just injured her instead, easily! The whole reason why her death caused the
wedge was because she was helping Sam find a cure for Dean and they were lying
to him about it. But because she was in danger, Sam had to tell Dean what was
happening, and it caused a huge wedge between them because she died. But the
same effect would have been caused if the writers had saved her, but she was
badly injured instead. She could have easily been badly injured and the wedge
would have still been made. Hell, Cas could have saved her, because he can teleport because he’s an angel and the wedge between the brothers
would have still been there.
But no, the
writers killed her off. And now she probably isn’t coming back.
This happens
time and time again in things, TV shows especially, where characters are killed
off for no reason. I understand it when an actor wants to leave, like with
Derek and Greys Anatomy, but even then that death could have been avoided.
Derek could have simply just stayed in DC and asked for a divorce or something
instead of dying in one of the worst character death scenes I have ever seen. I
cried after that one. Actually cried, and
I rarely cry over character death, I generally end up just getting annoyed.
Because
characters aren’t supposed to just die to create tension, or to be a shock that
creates hype on the internet. It’s supposed to really mean something. It’s
supposed to be like Buffy’s mum, who died to force Buffy to grow up and stand
on her own two feet. Like Dobby, who died saving Harry. Like probably Captain
America, who’s death will hopefully force Tony to see the extent of what he’s
doing and stop the war.
It’s supposed
to be like that, not a death just for hype. When it’s for hype, it’s just
pathetic, and clear that the writers are lazy and have no idea on what to do
with a character anymore. It’s stupid, and I hate it. Now don’t get me wrong, I
understand when writers have to rapidly change story lines because actors are
pregnant, like in Bones, so they have to write something like Vincent dying to
force Booth and Brennan to finally sleep together out of shock or something, so
Brennan gets pregnant. That I can totally understand, but surely it doesn’t
always have to end in death?
Can’t a
character just be injured for once? Or can’t they come back as a ghost? Or
decide to move away? Or something that
isn’t them dying for once?! Killing someone off isn’t the only way to get rid
of them, it is entirely possible for characters to leave through other means
and still have it hurt like hell. Look at the Doctor and Rose at Bad Wolf Bay, Christina
leaving Greys Anatomy, Zack turning out to be Gormagon in Bones!
All of those
hurt like hell, and with Rose and Zack alike, created great plot twists people
weren’t expecting. It’s entirely possible to create a feels inducing moment
without killing people off. Writers, take note of that, and stop killing people
like Charlie Bradbury off. Please, before I lose my mind.
What do you
guys think about character death like this? Do you think any of the people I’ve
mentioned had a good send off, if so, why? Or are there any other characters
you pretend didn't die because their deaths were so utterly pointless? Or did
you see a really great character send off that didn't involve them dying? Let
me know down in the comments, it would be great to hear from you!
